Inside Germany’s paedophile experiment

January 9, 2022

Andrew Gold. Unherd.

Germany has a torrid relationship with paedophilia, having run a state-sponsored programme in the Seventies that deliberately placed paedophiles with homeless children. It remains a black mark on the nation’s recent history, one that stems from an astonishingly misguided push from some on the Left to include paedophiles in their support for LGBT rights. The reputation of the nation’s Green Party has never fully recovered.

https://unherd.com/2022/01/inside-germanys-paedophile-experiment/

Hidden away in a village in northern Germany, Ruby has lived a lonely and tormented existence. Just 25 years old, she has a horrifying secret that, if exposed, could see her ostracised, even killed.

Ruby is a paedophile.

Ruby is an anomaly in a paedophilic world dominated by men; one doctor told me that only three of the 10,000 he’d treated were female. Rarer still, she’s managed to form a relationship with a man with similar urges. Last year, she met Sirius on an online forum for non-offending paedophiles. By chance, they lived in the same village.

I’d been talking to Ruby for more than a year, at that point, as part of an investigation into the murky world of paedophilia and to work out what can be done to curb child sexual abuse. Her pseudonym came from the Latin for Little Red Riding Hood: rubra cucullo. “People think I’m the little girl,” she told me. “But actually, I’m the wolf.”

With time, Ruby came to trust me, and invited me to meet her and Sirius. They were waiting for me on the platform when I arrived on my train from Berlin: dressed in black hoodies and loose jeans.

They stood petrified, mute. Ruby began to weep. Sirius, 27, couldn’t meet my gaze. I was the first non-paedophile aside from Ruby’s mother they’d told.

As we walked, and I talked, they gradually began to open up about their Age of Attractions (AOA) which both insisted they would never act upon. I’d been investigating paedophilia for more than a year, but their confession involved one of the most disturbing descriptions I’d ever heard.

Ruby went on to describe her unhappy childhood; her father made her feel unwanted, never expressing love or attempting to bond with her. She first realised something was off as a teenager, when she became aroused by Japanese animé depicting young boys.

She explained how being able to talk about her urges with Sirius had offered a reprieve from loneliness, and saved them both from suicide. Despite not fitting one another’s attraction briefs, they are now in love. During sex, which they have at least once a day, they take turns to pretend to be a baby.

***

Germany has a torrid relationship with paedophilia, having run a state-sponsored programme in the Seventies that deliberately placed paedophiles with homeless children. It remains a black mark on the nation’s recent history, one that stems from an astonishingly misguided push from some on the Left to include paedophiles in their support for LGBT rights. The reputation of the nation’s Green Party has never fully recovered.

Yet, somehow, a liberal strain continues to lace the country’s approach to paedophilia. In the UK, the US and Australia, reporting paedophiles to authorities is mandatory. Not so in Germany.

As a journalist who specialises in controversial subcultures, I stumbled across the Don’t Offend clinic in Germany while seeking my new topic.

Run out of Berlin’s Charité Hospital, the clinic invites what it terms “minor-attracted persons” to come in and talk without fear of being reported. In effect, it means letting known sex offenders back on the streets where they could abuse again. The clinic — which introduced me to Ruby — counters that this is the only way to get them to come in for therapy to learn to control their urges.

I met Maximilian von Heyden, a social worker and senior researcher at Don’t Offend. He admitted that it’s unlikely his patients will ever erase their urges. “But they come to therapy to improve their lives and try to cope with this better.”

I’m curious about whether he would let his children hang around with one of his patients. “I wouldn’t leave my children with someone I don’t know,” he replied. “We have quite a good success rate when it comes to establishing behavioural self-control, but we don’t succeed all the time, so there’s always a risk. In general, if I have a good relationship with a patient and he’s opening up and telling me about his sexuality… I’d probably be more cautious.”

He tells me that the clinic has discovered that around 4% of the general population have an attraction towards minors. And, like most researchers in his field, Von Heyden, he states that research and clinical experience point towards it being stable throughout life. However, a small minority, including those behind the UK’s Stop It Now! programme, maintain that it is a curable illness. The difference in opinion is stark, and shows just how far we are from a thorough understanding of paedophilia.

Donald Findlater, director of Stop It Now! told me: “Von Heyden is trying to take over the world with [Don’t Offend]. They’ve spent years touring the globe and convincing politicians in Germany their version of the world is correct. They’re very clear that it’s a sexuality.”

“I’m saying it’s not. It’s part of a learned behaviour that’s come often from adverse childhood things that happened to them. It therefore has the capacity to change, unlike homosexuality and heterosexuality that tend to have a strong biological component.” Findlater also points out that Don’t Offend doesn’t record the names of their patients, so has no way of knowing how successful it is at curbing child abuse; other sexologists in Germany have also attacked the way the clinic labels patients so rigidly with the condition.

But, for the most part, it has escaped criticism in Germany, where its adverts adorn the insides of metro carriages: “Don’t be an offender. Get help.” It appears the lack of mandatory reporting and empirical evidence is a loss that many Germans are prepared to take in the battle to curb child abuse.

The clinic separates paedophiles into four types. There are those who would never offend, and don’t need help. There are others who are psychopaths; realistically; little can be done about them. There is also a subsection of OCD sufferers who falsely believe they’re attracted to children, to the point of inventing false memories of having been abused. The clinic will send them to OCD specialists.

But where it clams to make the biggest impact is with the fourth type: those paedophiles who let biases sway them. Von Heyden said: “Working on cognitive biases is a big part of what we do. They think: ‘Oh the kids want it, they love it, they tease me.’ But they have to realise normal behaviour from children isn’t sexual and even if does seem like the child is teasing you, it doesn’t mean you’re allowed, as an adult, to follow that impulse.”

Does it work? For Ruby and Sirius, it appears that talking to one another about their urges has helped them to keep them under control. But until they collect sufficient data, it is impossible to know if the clinic’s claims are true.

And so we’re left with a debate that is unlikely to be resolved any time soon. On one side of the argument are those who point to the fact that Don’t Offend has enquiries from prospective patients from all over the world, with many moving to Germany for the therapy. On the other, there are those who’d rather point to the message recently scrawled outside von Heyden’s office: “Hang the Paedos.”


Comments

  • R Wright

    The Kentler Experiment is one of the most sordid tales i have ever heard. Why were the left so brazenly pro-paedophila in the 70s?

  • Brian Villanueva

    This is an impressive article on a hard subject to cover, let alone cover fairly.

    I get concerned when leaders say things like “paedophilia is a fixed sexual preference”. My concern is not that they’re correct, but that such terminology intentionally obscures reality. It’s a little like saying that “cannibalism is a fixed culinary preference” — whether it’s scientifically valid is the least important part of the statement.

    Something that is truly a “fixed sexual preference” would absolutely rise to the level of an “identity” in the new vernacular. And sexual identities are now enshrined in law as protected. It may placate postmodernist university professors to say that pedophiles aren’t “freaks who want to molest kids” but instead have a “child attracted identity”… but it doesn’t makes kids any safer.

  • Ian Stewart

    I’ve just read the linked to the New Yorker article and I’m pretty shocked. It’s probably one of the most disturbing articles I’ve ever read.

    Why has this not been reported more widely? It appears to be because German culture accommodates paedophilia more readily. And we get worked up about using the wrong gender or ethnic label.

    These kids were sent to live with paedophiles as foster parents, with the paedophilic activities acknowledged as a benefit(!) of the relationship, and cut off from their families – under the governance of German academia and the Berlin senate. For a childhood of abuse and no family in this case he got 50k euros and this was perceived in Germany as generous.

    Thanks for this Unherd – and I though Labour and PIE in the seventies was bad. Little did I know.

  • George Glashan

    ok so if we add BIPOC

    then we can get to BIOPTICALBINO++QBPG which is at least fun to say

  • Hersch Schneider

    ‘I’ve moved gays to the rear, but i doubt they’d object to that’

    Bit naughty that (made me chuckle)

  • George Glashan

    My apologies William you have correctly exposed my Necrophobia, i hereby acknowledge the pain, suffering and chafed raw genitals of all practicing Necro’s.

    This is stupid of me to ask but what’s the actual limit for this stuff, once the N’s are added, what possible perversions are left? i hope i don’t live long enough to find out.

    At least the acronym is improving. QILABBTPING++, i’ve moved gays to the rear, but i doubt they’d object to that. We’ve almost got a legible word going here.

  • Ian Stewart

    The article certainly informed me of a very disturbing cultural issue in Germany. Maybe you’d prefer this to be kept secret?

  • Doug Pingel

    The article gave information and a prod to make people think. Your rant did neither.

  • Doug Pingel

    The paedophile’s target is a pre-pubic child. How do you square the paedo’s rights (In your sexual utopia) with the safe-keeping and rights of the child?

  • Vijay Kant

    Identical twin studies, where one of a pair grows up to be gay and the other not, suggest that the origin of homosexuality may be epigenetic. It may occur in the last stage of a pregnancy. In other words, there is no gay gene.